CDCR

(PC) Maldonado v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20232:23-cv-00028California456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, No. 2:23-cv-00028 DJC DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he was denied a parole hearing due to prejudice and perjury by defendants. Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) On April 4, 2023, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that the court order plaintiff to pay the $402 filing fee. (ECF No. 8.) This recommendation was based on plaintiff’s complaint not alleging imminent danger of serious physical injury and court records indicating plaintiff has brought three or more prior dismissed actions within the meaning of subdivision (g) of section 1915. (Id. at 4.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.