Warden

(HC) Lizarraga v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20231:23-cv-00888California1,996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 ALBERTO LIZARRAGA, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-00888-SKO (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITH LEAVE ) TO FILE AN AMENDED PETITION v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 14 ) PROVIDE PETITIONER WITH BLANK § 2254 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, ) FORMS ) Respondent. ) [THIRTY-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] ) 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon conducting a preliminary screening of the petition, the Court finds that Petitioner has failed to name a proper respondent, failed to present any cognizable grounds for relief, and failed to exhaust state remedies. Therefore, the Court will DISMISS the petition with leave to file a First Amended Petition. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 8, 2013, Petitioner was convicted in the Kern County Superior Court of attempted murder with great bodily injury. (Doc. 1 at 2.1) On April 15, 2015,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.