CDCR

(PC) Jacobs v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20231:20-cv-00547California1,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE E. JACOBS, IV, No. 1:20-cv-00547-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

v. (ECF No. 60) CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff George E. Jacobs, IV (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 22, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge screened the first amended complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 42.) After four extensions of time, Plaintiff’s second amended complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal was due on or before September 28, 2022. (ECF Nos. 44, 46, 48, 51.) Despite the Magistrate Judge’s warning that, given the amount of time that had elapsed since issuance of the screening order, Plaintiff’s pattern of requesting multiple extensions of time in response to the Court’s order, and the length of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.