AT&T
(PS) Clewies v. AT&T
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL G. CLEWIES, No. 2:23–cv–834–DAD–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATINOS TO
DISMISS
v. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4.) AT&T INC., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel in this action, previously requested leave to amend without prepayment of the filing fee (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (authorizing the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees). This request was granted, but the undersigned found plaintiff’s complaint deficient, noted the issues with the claims as stated, and granted leave to amend. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff timely submitted his amended complaint (the “1AC”). (ECF No. 4.) However, instead of correcting for the errors noted in the previous order, plaintiff has chosen to double down on his deficient claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Thus, the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s 1AC be dismissed and leave to…