Anderson

(PC) Ennis v. Anderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20231:23-cv-00160California1,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH L. ENNIS, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00160-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF

MAY PROCEED ON COGNIZABLE

v. CLAIMS

ANDERSON, et al., (ECF No. 13) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Joseph L. Ennis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and he was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on June 14, 2023, is currently before this Court for screening. (ECF No. 13.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.