GS Holistic, LLC v. Roseville Smoke n Vape Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20232:22-cv-02036California4,551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, No. 2:22-cv-02036 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROSEVILLE SMOKE N VAPE INC d/b/a ROSEVILLE SMOKE N VAPE and BALJIT SINGH, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. ECF No. 10. The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(19). This motion was set for hearing on the papers on May 3, 2023. ECF No. 11. Defendants have not made any appearance. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s motion be GRANTED, and that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff, GS Holistic, brought its complaint on November 9, 2022, presenting claims of trademark infringement (15 U.S.C. § 1114), and false advertising (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)). ECF No. 1 at 10-13. Plaintiff alleges that it is the registered owner of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.