Goodwin
Goodwin v. Yamada
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUCHUN LAFRE GOODWIN, No. 1:23-cv-0345 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
v. THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL M. YAMADA, (Doc. 7) Defendant. 16 Duchun Lafre Goodwin, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, asserts he suffered violations of the Fair Housing Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. (See Doc. 1 at 4.) The magistrate judge reviewed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 4 at 3-6) The magistrate judge granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. (Id. at 6.) In the alternative, the Court informed Plaintiff that he “may choose to stand on the complaint,” in which case the magistrate judge would recommend dismissal. (Id.) Plaintiff was granted 30 days from the date of service to either file amended complaint or notify the Court he would stand on the initial complaint. (Id. at 7.) …