Goodwin

Goodwin v. Yamada

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20231:23-cv-00345California685 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUCHUN LAFRE GOODWIN, No. 1:23-cv-0345 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL M. YAMADA, (Doc. 7) Defendant. 16 Duchun Lafre Goodwin, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, asserts he suffered violations of the Fair Housing Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. (See Doc. 1 at 4.) The magistrate judge reviewed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 4 at 3-6) The magistrate judge granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. (Id. at 6.) In the alternative, the Court informed Plaintiff that he “may choose to stand on the complaint,” in which case the magistrate judge would recommend dismissal. (Id.) Plaintiff was granted 30 days from the date of service to either file amended complaint or notify the Court he would stand on the initial complaint. (Id. at 7.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.