Meritt
(PC) Wilson v. Meritt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WAYNE WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTION
ORDER
LURA MERRITT, et al., (Doc. 31) Defendants.
The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s “Motion for Protection Order,” which the Court construed as a motion for temporary and/or permanent injunctive relief. (Doc. 31.) The Court advised the Plaintiff that any objections were due within 14 days of the date of service (Id. at 6) and that the “[f]ailure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has expired. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of…