Meritt

(PC) Wilson v. Meritt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20231:22-cv-00455California280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WAYNE WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTION

ORDER

LURA MERRITT, et al., (Doc. 31) Defendants.

The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s “Motion for Protection Order,” which the Court construed as a motion for temporary and/or permanent injunctive relief. (Doc. 31.) The Court advised the Plaintiff that any objections were due within 14 days of the date of service (Id. at 6) and that the “[f]ailure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has expired. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.