Rattan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN HENDERSON, No. 2:22-cv-1218 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RATTAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a request for the court to determine the sufficiency of the defendant’s discovery responses, which the court construes as a motion to compel. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff requests that the court determine the sufficiency of defendant’s discovery responses, claiming that defendant has objected to all but eight of his discovery requests, made meritless objections, and provided partial, evasive responses. Id. 29 at 1-2. However, plaintiff fails to specify which responses are at issue, and even assuming he is seeking to compel further responses to all of his requests, plaintiff fails to explain how each response or objection is deficient as to each particular request and instead makes general assertions that the objections are meritless and the responses incomplete. Id. at 1.…