Aung
(PC) Wilhelm v. Aung
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE WILHELM, No. 2:22-cv-02323 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SANDAR AUNG, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for clarification (ECF No. 4) and plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 6). For the reasons set forth below, the court will strike plaintiff’s complaint and grant plaintiff’s motion for clarification. BACKGROUND On December 27, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for injunction and temporary restraining order, which was not accompanied by a complaint. (ECF No. 1.) On April 3, 2023, the court issued an order denying the motion without prejudice and directing plaintiff to file a complaint thirty days from the date of service of the order. (ECF…