Epperson

Epperson v. U.S. Supreme Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20231:23-cv-00592California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS EPPERSON, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-0592 JLT SAB ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) U.S. SUPREME COURT, et al., ) (Doc. 7) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Chris Epperson is proceeding pro se in this action, in which he identified the following defendants: (1) the Supreme Court of the United States; (2) Geoffrey S. Binney, identified as a pioneer from Texas; (3) Ronald Reagan, identified as a Republican from Kentucky; (4) Richard Nixon, identified as a Democratic from Montana; (5) Robert E. Wood, with the job or title identified as “Jefferson Petursburg” from New York City; and (6) “Valdmir Putin” from Moscow (Doc. 1 at 1-4.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted, and recommended the action be dismissed as frivolous. (Doc. 7 at 3-5.) The Court served…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.