(PC) Rojo v. Amador Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20232:22-cv-02137California495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS ALBERTO MEZA ROJO, Case No. 2:22-cv-02137-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 24, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that the claims were not cognizable. ECF No. 7. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. I also warned him that failure to comply with the February 24 order could result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 3. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on April 27, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 9. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this action he must file, within twenty-one days, an amended complaint or advisement of his intent to stand by his current complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.