(PC) Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20231:22-cv-00401California911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY W. MUNDY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00401-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

RESTRAINING ORDER PREVENTING

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL TRANSFER STAFF, et al., (ECF No. 42) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Stanley A. Mundy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for retraining order preventing his transfer to a different yard or different prison facility, filed June 16, 2023. I. DISCUSSION “A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.” Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (citation omitted). “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.