Asman
(PS) Schmitz v. Asman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER ADAM ASMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST COMPLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT. After considering the parties’ joint status report (ECF No. 283), the Court issues the following pretrial scheduling order. NATURE OF THE CASE Plaintiffs Dianne Mallia and Thomas Schmitz, individually and as successors of interest, assert the following causes of action in the operative Fourth Amended Complaint: Deliberate Indifference to Serious Medical Needs, Health and Safety in Violation of the Eight Amendment; Supervisory Liability based on Customs, Practices or…