Asman

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20232:20-cv-00195California1,895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER ADAM ASMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST COMPLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT. After considering the parties’ joint status report (ECF No. 283), the Court issues the following pretrial scheduling order. NATURE OF THE CASE Plaintiffs Dianne Mallia and Thomas Schmitz, individually and as successors of interest, assert the following causes of action in the operative Fourth Amended Complaint: Deliberate Indifference to Serious Medical Needs, Health and Safety in Violation of the Eight Amendment; Supervisory Liability based on Customs, Practices or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.