Wanless

Wanless v. Peloton Interactive. Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20232:23-cv-00405California5,593 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMMIE WANLESS, et al., No. 2:23-CV-00405-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs Tammie and Mike Wanless, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and the case has been reassigned. See ECF Nos. 7, 8, & 10. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. See ECF No. 15. The parties appeared before the undersigned on June 7, 2023, for a hearing. Plaintiffs’ counsel appeared in person. Defense counsel appeared remotely via Zoom. At the conclusion of the hearing, the matter was submitted for issuance of a formal order. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ motion insofar as Plaintiffs’ action will be referred to arbitration with respect to Mrs. Wanless’s claims and stayed as to Mr. Wanless’s claim for loss of consortium. The parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.