(PC) Gradford v. Sergeant Perea
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20231:23-cv-00028California521 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
• 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, 1:23-cv-00028-ADA-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER
vs. RULE 41 (ECF No. 11.) SERGEANT PEREA, et al.,
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE
Defendants. FILE
19 William J. Gradford (“Plaintiff”) is a former jail inmate proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On June 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of this case under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has a right to voluntarily dismiss this case under Rule 41. In Wilson v. City of San Jose, the Ninth Circuit explained:
Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss 27 his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Concha v. London,…