Leibrock

(PS) Selck v. Leibrock

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20232:23-cv-01031California2,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:23-cv-01031 TLN AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LAW OFFICES OF BRANDAN

LEIBROCK AND JOHN GONZALEZ,

14 Defendants. 15 16 On June 1, 2023, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned reviewed the complaint and, concerned that this court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, ordered plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff filed a response on June 12, 2023. ECF No. 6. The court has reviewed the response and concludes that the court lacks jurisdiction. I. The Complaint The complaint alleges that attorney John Gonzalez assumed representation of plaintiff in a Sacramento County criminal case, and that Gonzalez and his law partner Brandan Liebrock mishandled the case, committed numerous acts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.