Sidhu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAMALPREET KAUR SIDHU, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-00417 JLT CDB ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS RAMIRO ) AND EMERITA MINERO’S MOTION TO v. ) DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE JACK WRIGHT, et al., ) THE MATTER Defendants. ) (Doc. 15) ) 16 Plaintiff alleges Defendants engaged in fraudulent conspiracy, mortgage fraud, and wrongful foreclosure in connection with the purchase and sale of certain real property owned by her and/or her husband. (See generally Doc. 1.) Ramiro and Emerita Minero (“the Mineros” or “Minero Defendants”) seek dismissal of the Complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff opposes dismissal, asserting subject matter jurisdiction exists and the Complaint states a plausible claim for relief. (Doc. 23.) The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and…