(PS) Hill v. PeopleReady, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20232:23-cv-00306California723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH HILL, No. 2:23-cv-00306-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

PEOPLEREADY, INC., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND THE

COMPLAINT, AND DISMISSING CERTAIN

Defendant. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (Doc. Nos. 7, 12) 17 Plaintiff Kenneth Hill is proceeding pro se in this civil action, which defendant removed to this federal court on February 17, 2023. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 18, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendation recommending that plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 7) be denied because both of plaintiff’s proposed additional claims would fail. (Doc. No. 12 at 4–5.) First, the magistrate judge found that plaintiff’s proposed retaliation claim under Title…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.