Reziapkine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING Case No. 2:21-cv-02235-DAD-JDP

AGENCY,

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

DANIL RESIAPKINE,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Tahoe Regional Planning Agency alleges that defendant Danil Reziapkine violated the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact by mooring a watercraft and operating a rental concession in Lake Tahoe without authorization. Defendant failed to timely answer the complaint, and plaintiff now moves for default judgment. Plaintiff’s motion was before the court for hearing on June 1, 2023. Attorney John Marshall appeared on behalf of plaintiff; defendant failed to appear. I recommend that plaintiff’s motion be granted. Background In the late 1960’s, California, Nevada, and the federal government adopted the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact (“Compact”), which established the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”) to coordinate and regulate development in the Lake Tahoe Basin. ECF No. 1…