(HC) Sho v. S.F. Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20231:21-cv-01812California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONSURU WOLE SHO, No. 1:21-cv-1812-TLN-AC Petitioner, No. 1:23-cv-0029-TLN-AC v. ORDER CURRENT OR ACTING FIELD OFFICE

DIRECTOR, SAN FRANCISCO FIELD

OFFICE, UNITED STATES

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

ENFORCEMENT, et al. Respondents. 18 19 Petitioner, an immigration detainee, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 15, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 47 at 9-10.) All parties have stated their non-opposition to the findings and recommendations. (ECF Nos. 48, 49.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.