Fox
(PC) Birrell v. Fox
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., No. 2:16-cv-1818 DJC CKD P Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ROBERT W. FOX, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Alford, the only remaining plaintiff in this action, is proceeding on a claim for injunctive relief under the Eighth Amendment for exposure to harmful substances, including asbestos, against defendant Fox in his official capacity as the Warden of the California Medical Facility. Defendant Fox has answered. Discovery commenced some time ago but was never completed. A review of the court’s record reveals that defendant Alford no longer resides at the California Medical facility. This being the case, defendant will be granted 21 days within which to file a motion to dismiss Alford’s remaining claim as moot. See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 n.5 (9th Cir. 2007) (prisoner's claims for injunctive relief generally become moot upon transfer) citing Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 519 (9th…