Block

Block v. Salem

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20231:22-cv-01596California989 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01596-JLT-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING SET FOR

JULY 14, 2023

v.

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

MOHAMED NASSER SALEM, individually SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING and dba QUICK MART, REGARDING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT Defendant. (Doc. 14)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 17 On June 2, 2023, Plaintiff Hendrik Block filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant Mohamed Nasser Salem, individually and dba Quick Mart. (Doc. 14.) Following a preliminary review of the motion, the Court finds supplemental briefing is warranted. In deciding whether to grant or deny a default judgment, a court must assess the adequacy of the service of process on the party against whom default is requested. See, e.g., Trujillo v. Harsarb, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-00342-NONE-SAB, 2021 WL 3783388, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021) (“As a general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.