Anderson
Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD ANDERSON, RAYMOND No. 2:18-cv-00714 DJC AC KEITHCORUM, and JESSE AND COLLEEN WORTHINGTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P., Defendant. 18 Defendant has moved to quash a Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 third-party subpoena, ECF No. 117, and the motion is before the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). Plaintiffs oppose the motion, ECF No. 123, and defendant has filed a reply, ECF No. 124. The matter was heard on a shortened schedule on June 21, 2023. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion. I. Relevant Background This is a class action lawsuit in which plaintiffs Edward Anderson, Raymond Keith Corum, and Colleen and Jesse Worthington allege that Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“EDJ”), a registered broker-dealer and a fiduciary under California law, breached its fiduciary duty by failing to…