Pizano
Northfield Ins. Co. v. Pizano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORTHFIELD INSURANCE No. 2:19-cv-01198-TLN-JDP
COMPANY,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.
URIEL GUERRERO PIZANO,
15 Defendant.
17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Northfield Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 29.) Defendant Uriel Guerrero Pizano (“Pizano”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 33.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 35.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff issued Commercial Insurance Policy No. WS354101 to Pizano, an individual dba Val-Nap Bar & Pub, for the period July 13, 2018, to July 13, 2019. (ECF No. 33-1 at 2.) The insuring agreement of the policy provides, [Plaintiff] will pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages . . . to which this insurance applies. We will have the right and duty to defend the…