Castillo

Castillo v. The Well Community Church

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20231:21-cv-01460California3,849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRYSTAL CASTILLO, No. 1:21-cv-01460-ADA-BAM

Plaintiff,

ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW

v. THE WELL COMMUNITY CHURCH, a California corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17

In this case, Plaintiff Krystal Castillo (“Plaintiff”) alleges employment discrimination, retaliation, interference with prospective economic relations, and defamation by Defendant The Well Community Church (“Defendant”). (Doc. 39.) In response to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production No. 47-49 and 53, Defendant produced responsive documents but also withheld or redacted approximately 20-25 emails that it claimed were protected by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. (Doc. 55.) To resolve the remaining issues regarding whether these documents were privileged, the Court directed Defendant to submit the identified emails and any other similar emails located during Defendant's rolling production which do not have an attorney as sender or recipient that are alleged to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.