Warden

(HC) Morales v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20232:23-cv-00761California740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ALONSO MORALES, No. 2:23-cv-00761-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, FCI HERLONG, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He has paid the filing fee. I. § 2241 Petition In his three-page habeas application, petitioner asks the court to order the Bureau of Prisons to apply an unspecified number of time credits pursuant to the First Step Act to his December 17, 2023 release date. ECF No. 1. Although petitioner indicates that he has attached his FSA Time Credit Assessment and a Program Review Sheet as exhibits to his petition, there are no attachments included. See ECF No. 1 at 2-3. II. Preliminary Review Requirement Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the court to conduct a preliminary

1 Hereinafter, the court refers to the First Step Act as the “FSA.” review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.