(PC)Riseley

(PC)Riseley v. Covella

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20232:21-cv-01078California2,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS FOOTE RISELEY, No. 2:21-cv-1078 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COVELLA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF Nos. 1, 4. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. In addition, plaintiff will be given an opportunity to amend the complaint. I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 4. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.