Samuels

(HC) Allen v. Samuels

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20231:23-cv-00503California607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE ALLEN, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-0503 JLT HBK (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING v. ) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, ) AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO D. SAMUELS, ) CLOSE CASE ) Respondent. ) (Docs. 1, 6) ) ) 16 Clarence Allen, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge conducted a preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. On May 24, 2023, the magistrate judge found Petitioner failed to state a claim and recommended the Petition be dismissed. (Doc. 6 at 2-4.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner on the same date and notified him that any objections must be filed within 14 days. (Id. at 4.) In addition, the Court advised that the “that failure to file objections within the specified time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.