Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL J. GADDY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00412-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS CAME

13 v. BE DISMISSED BASED ON THE

DOCTRINE OF RES JUDICATA

C. PFEIFFER, et al.,

(ECF No. 15). Defendants. 16 Michael J. Gaddy alleges that prison officials miscalculated his parole eligibility date and improperly denied Gaddy a parole hearing when he was entitled to one. Gaddy asserts that Defendants failed to correctly apply several penal code provisions regarding the start date of consecutive felony terms, failed to properly notify Gaddy of the legal reason for changing his parole hearing date (which is now in 2035), and deprived Gaddy of his opportunity to be heard by failing to hold a parole hearing. Gaddy brings due process claims under the Fifth and Fourteenth 23 Amendments, a deliberate indifference Eighth Amendment claim based on Defendants’ failure to 24 investigate Gaddy’s…