McBrien
(PS) Tucker v. McBrien
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN J. TUCKER, No. 2:23-cv-00526-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER PETER McBRIEN, et al., Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, who proceeds without counsel, initiated this action with a complaint filed on March 20, 2023. On May 23, 2023, defendant, Sacramento County Clerk Recorder, filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the motion for a hearing to take place on July 26, 2023, before the undersigned.1 (ECF No. 9.) On June 1, 2023, defendants, Judge Peter J. McBrien and Commissioner Scott P. Harman, filed their motion to dismiss, giving notice for a hearing on the same date. (ECF No. 10.) Under the court’s Local Rules, plaintiff was to respond to each motion no less than 14 days after the motion was filed. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days after 27 This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant…