Ramirez

(PC) Chavez v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20231:20-cv-01269California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO CHAVEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01269-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S UNSIGNED NOTICE

v. OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL RAMIREZ, et al., (Doc. No. 17) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On June 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed an unsigned and undated notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. No. 17, “Notice”). Rule 11 requires all pleadings, written motions, and other papers be signed by at least one attorney of record or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); see also E.D. Ca. Local Rule 131(b). “The Court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney’s or party’s attention.” Id. Here, considering Plaintiff does not have access to CM/ECF, the Court directs the Clerk to strike the unsigned Notice. To the extent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.