Brown

Brown v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20231:23-cv-00265California325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BONNIE BROWN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00265-ADA-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE EXPERIAN v. INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. AS DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

(ECF No. 18) SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff initiated this action on February 20, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On June 25, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., only. (ECF No. 18.) The notice of dismissal does not pertain to the other named Defendants. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.