(PC) Hill v. Lynch
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:22-cv-0686 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JEFF LYNCH, et al.,
Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Procedural and Factual Background On June 5, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to supplement his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) because deposits to his trust account suggested that his claim of having received no money from any source over the past twelve months was not accurate. ECF No. 8. Specifically, the undersigned found that [t]he application to proceed in forma pauperis represents that plaintiff has no cash or assets and in the last twelve months has not received any money from a business, profession, or self-employment; rent payments, royalties, interest, or dividends; pensions, annuities, or life insurance; disability …