Provins

Prehired, LLC v. Provins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20232:22-cv-00384California4,146 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PREHIRED, LLC, No. 2:22-cv-00384-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S

MATTHEW PROVINS, FEES AND COSTS Defendant. (Doc. No. 55) 16 This matter is before the court on the motion for attorney’s fees and costs filed on behalf of defendant on April 26, 2023. (Doc. No. 55.) On June 23, 2023, defendant’s motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 63.) For the reasons explained below, defendant’s motion will be granted. BACKGROUND On March 1, 2022, plaintiff Prehired, LLC (“Prehired”) filed the complaint initiating this action against defendant, alleging two state law claims: trade libel and intentional interference with business relationships. (Doc. No. 1 at 7, 10.) A few days later, plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order, which defendant opposed. (Doc. Nos. 5, 20.) The court denied 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.