Better Meat Co. v. Emergy, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20232:21-cv-02338California729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE BETTER MEAT CO., No. 2:21-cv-02338-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. EMERGY, Inc. d/b/a MEATI FOODS, PAUL WRONSKY, and BOND CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT LP.,

16 Defendants. 17 EMERGY, INC. d/b/a MEATI FOODS, 18 Counter Claimant, 19 v. THE BETTER MEAT CO. and AUGUSTUS

PATTILLO,

22 Counter Defendants. 23 24 As explained below, the court denies plaintiff/counter-defendant Better Meat’s administrative motion for a stay of defendant/counter-claimant Emergy’s motion for attorneys’ 27 fees.

On April 17, 2023, this court granted Emergy’s motion to strike Better Meat’s complaint under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. Prior Order (Apr. 17, 2023), ECF No. 134. Emergy then moved for attorneys’ fees and costs related to its motion. Mot. for Fees, ECF No. 136. Oral argument on Emergy’s motion is scheduled for July 21, 2023. Id. Simultaneously, Better Meat moves to stay Emergy’s motion for fees and moves for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.