Messer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN MICHAEL BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01313-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS

M. MESSER, et al.,

Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE

17 On May 22, 2023, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (Docs. 31 & 32.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s oppositions or statements of non-opposition to the motions were to be filed “not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion.” More than 21 days have passed, yet Plaintiff has filed neither oppositions nor statements of non-opposition to Defendants’ motions. 23 Moreover, in this case, Plaintiff was advised in the Court’s May 26, 2023 Order1 that the deadline for opposing Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss was June 12, 2023, and that any request for an extension of time should be filed prior to that date. (See Doc. 34 at 4.)…