Cruz
Cruz v. MM 879, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELA CRUZ, et al., No. 1:15-cv-01563-TLN-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER MM 879, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Angela Cruz, Maria Madrigal, Lourdes Baiz, and Christie Goodman’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 219.) Defendant Barrett Business Services, Inc. (“BBSI”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 220.) Defendant MM 879, Inc. (“MM 879”) filed a statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 222.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 223.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs requests a three-month extension of the discovery cutoff — from June 30 to September 30, 2023. (ECF No. 219-1 at 5.) The Scheduling Order in this case provides that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 16(b), the order “shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause.” (ECF No. 209 at…