BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Ronsher Trans
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Case No. 1:23-cv-00369-ADA-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
RONSHER TRANS, et al., (ECF No. 10) Defendants.
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A.’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment, filed on May 12, 2023. (ECF No. 10.) No oppositions were filed and the deadline to do so has now expired. A hearing on the motion was held on June 28, 2023. (ECF No. 11.) Counsel Ken Ichi Ito appeared by videoconference for Plaintiff. No appearances were made by Defendants Ronsher Trans or Ramandeep Sandhu. (See id.) Having considered the moving papers, the declarations and exhibits attached thereto, supplemental briefing, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following findings and recommendations recommending Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted. /// /// /// …