BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Ronsher Trans

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20231:23-cv-00369California6,485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Case No. 1:23-cv-00369-ADA-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

RONSHER TRANS, et al., (ECF No. 10) Defendants.

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A.’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment, filed on May 12, 2023. (ECF No. 10.) No oppositions were filed and the deadline to do so has now expired. A hearing on the motion was held on June 28, 2023. (ECF No. 11.) Counsel Ken Ichi Ito appeared by videoconference for Plaintiff. No appearances were made by Defendants Ronsher Trans or Ramandeep Sandhu. (See id.) Having considered the moving papers, the declarations and exhibits attached thereto, supplemental briefing, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following findings and recommendations recommending Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted. /// /// /// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.