Dacuycuy

(PC) Abdullah v. Dacuycuy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20232:19-cv-00804California7,234 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HANIF S. ABDULLAH, No. 2:19-cv-0804 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DACUYCUY, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Hanif S. Abdullah, a former state prisoner, proceeds through counsel with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is before the court. (ECF No. 52.) This matter was previously taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the following reasons, the undersigned recommends the motion be granted as to plaintiff’s claims against defendant Mutopo and denied as to plaintiff’s claims against defendants Hortizuela and Dacuycuy. I. BACKGROUND Proceeding pro se, plaintiff filed the operative first amended complaint on April 26, 2021. (ECF No. 25.) On June 11, 2021, the court screened the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found it stated cognizable claims under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Dacuycuy,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.