Medina
Medina v. Mapes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY MEDINA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00844-JLT-EPG Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFFS’
13 v. APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS BE DENIED
COURTNEY MAPES, M.D.,
(ECF Nos. 47, 48). Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
17 Plaintiffs Bradley Medina and Svetlana Krivencheva, proceeding pro se, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 45). As the Court found that Plaintiffs’ application did not provide sufficient information for the Court to determine if they were entitled to proceed in this action without prepayment of fees and costs, it required Plaintiffs to fill out separate long form applications containing each individual Plaintiff’s financial information. (ECF No. 46, pp. 2-3). On June 14, 2023, Plaintiffs filed separate applications as required. (ECF Nos. 47 & 48). For the reasons that follow,…