Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00922-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING IMROPER PLEADING v. (Doc. No. 16) G. LOPEZ, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s second reply filed on October 21, 2022. (Doc. No. 16). Local Rule 230(l) of the Eastern District of California authorizes in prisoner actions the filing of a motion, an opposition, and a reply. Plaintiff filed a reply in response to Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to remand on October 3, 2022. (Doc. No. 15). Thus, the filing of a second reply is not authorized. The Court initially construed the second reply as a supplemental reply. (See Doc. No. 22). Upon further review of the second reply, however, the Court cannot construe the second reply as a supplemental reply because it does not inform the Court of new facts or newly decided case law that is relevant to the dispute before it. Myers v. Freed, No. CV- 26 …