Warden

(HC) Hernandez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20232:23-cv-00528California669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ, No. 2:23-cv-00528-DAD-CKD (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

WARDEN, HABEAS PETITION DUE TO

PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Respondent. AND TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER (Doc. No. 4)

17 Petitioner Alejandro Hernandez is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 24, 2023, the court ordered petitioner to either file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee in order to proceed with this habeas action. (Doc. No. 3.) The court provided petitioner with thirty days to comply with that order. (Id. at 1.) Petitioner has not paid the required filing fee to proceed with this action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.