Benavidez

(HC) Pulizzano v. Benavidez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20232:21-cv-00503California503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES JOSEPH PULIZZANO, No. 2:21-cv-0503 WBS CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER JENNIFER BENAVIDEZ, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 13, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In the operative amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner asserts he was denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment. In his objections, petitioner asserts instances of ineffective assistance of counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.