Unknown
(HC) Ward v. Unknown
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH D. WARD, No. 2:23-cv-01212 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 On June 20, 2023, petitioner, a state prisoner at CSP-Corcoran, filed what appears to be the final pages to a habeas corpus petition on a California state court form. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner’s letter to the Clerk with the document states “I sent a habeas corpus form on 06/13/23” but without “all the documents.” (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner states the instant filing is the “rest of the habeas corpus form.” (Id.) However, no other filing has been received at this court from petitioner that appears to correspond with this partial petition.1 In order to commence an action, petitioner must file a petition for writ of habeas corpus as required by Rule 3 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases, and petitioner must either pay the
1 Petitioner already proceeds in this court in a habeas action titled Ward v. Peery, No. 2:21-cv- 26 2220 DAD KJN.…