Richson-Bey

Richson-Bey v. Palmer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20231:23-cv-00463California4,402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN JEFFREY RICHSON-BEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00463-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION

W. PALMER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING THE

Defendants. COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 1)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-

ONE DAYS

18 19 Plaintiff Sean Jeffrey Richson-Bey (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March 27, 2023, against W. Palmer, M. Benninghoff, and Wolf (collectively, “Defendants”). (ECF No. 1.) The complaint is now before this Court for screening. For the reasons stated herein, the Court recommends that the complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.