Woolwine

Woolwine v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20231:22-cv-00371California175 words

Trial Court Opinion

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 GREG WOOLWINE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00371-ADA-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

V. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendant. (ECF No. 14) 14 On June 28, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 14.) In light of the 16 stipulation of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. 17 City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 19 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 20

IS SO ORDERED.

FA. Pated: _June 29, 2023 __ Of

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28