Cortez

Cortez v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20231:23-cv-00317California654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY CORTEZ, individually and on Case No. 1:23-cv-00317-ADA-CDB behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF

Plaintiffs, COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND v. ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., TO RULE 41(a)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendant. 16 (Doc. 13) 17 This action was removed from Kern County Superior Court on March 2, 2023. (Doc. 1). The parties agreed to extend Defendant’s time to respond to the complaint (Docs. 6, 7, 10). However, Defendant did not answer or file a pre-answer motion; instead, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement on June 20, 2023, in which they represented they had executed a written settlement agreement. (Doc. 12). Pending before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal, filed on June 26, 2023 (Doc. 13), in which the parties stipulate to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.