(PS) Tillman-Conerly v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20232:22-cv-01617California1,783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARILYN Y. TILLMAN-CONERLY, No. 2:22-cv-1617 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES OFFICE OF

PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT;

LAVERNE WATSON, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendant moves to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff opposes the motion. ECF No. 12, 14. The parties appeared before the court for a hearing on the motion on June 28, 2023. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends this case be DISMISSED in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. Background Marilyn Y. Tillman-Conerly, proceeding in pro se, filed her complaint on September 15, 2022. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff paid the filing fee, id., so the complaint was not subject to screening under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.