(PS) Tillman-Conerly v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARILYN Y. TILLMAN-CONERLY, No. 2:22-cv-1617 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES OFFICE OF
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT;
LAVERNE WATSON, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendant moves to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff opposes the motion. ECF No. 12, 14. The parties appeared before the court for a hearing on the motion on June 28, 2023. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends this case be DISMISSED in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. Background Marilyn Y. Tillman-Conerly, proceeding in pro se, filed her complaint on September 15, 2022. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff paid the filing fee, id., so the complaint was not subject to screening under 28…