Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00616 SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS

J. HERNANDEZ, 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendant.

16 On May 31, 2023, Defendant Hernandez filed a motion for terminating sanctions for Plaintiff’s willful failure to participate in a deposition. (See Doc. 64.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion was to be filed “not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion.” More than 21 days have passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . .…